It is the norm that poor countries are given financial supports by developed countries, but it seems not really tackle poverty. Personally, I totally believe that wealthy countries should try to help poor ones in other ways instead of offering money.
It is undeniable that an enormous amount of money is needed to improve the living standards of people living under the poverty line. However, being given grants excessively may cause over-reliance among the citizens of poor countries. They could lose their working motivation and become lazy. To illustrate, unemployed who receive grants monthly tend to avoid finding jobs and live completely depend on financial supports. As a consequence, the number jobless people would considerably increase and the labor productivity in third-world countries would be affected detrimentally. Another problem this is that several nations may not have enough level of ability to utilize the grants effectively. In fact, the governments in developing countries used the money to build many wasteful and useless facilities instead of improving education and living quality of citizens. Take Sri Lanka as an example, they received financial aid from China. However, they used that money to build a luxury stadium. That is the reason why Sri Lanka and some other developing countries often struggle with in overcoming their financial problems.
On the grounds that many drawbacks of offering money to third-world countries, rich nations should help the poor ones by using several other methods. One of which is providing modern technology, especially agricultural machines. This could be an extremely effective way to make profit thanks to the better quality of production for exporting some products such as rice, fruits or clothes Moreover, people who can use those kinds of machines may secure employment to ensure their income. The second way to help the poor countries is to give the students here scholarships and create a supportive environment for them to study. As a result, there would be more talented and skillful people who could be able to help their countries tackle poverty.
In conclusion, giving financial support to the poor countries by the rich ones is common but it could also cause various problems. However, governments from wealthy countries may use other ways such as providing technology or study opportunities instead of offering money.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, really, second, so, third, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81748888378 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2063281215 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.842105263 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291945183879 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930939493815 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814137822088 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217505398623 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556636965687 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.