It is argued that rich countries should accept expert and knowledge employees from poor countries. I completely agree with this idea because it is a opportunity for people who come from undeveloped countries to have better life, and also rich countries could use cheaper trained worker.
People who come from poor countries have bad effect on culture. Unfortunately, poor countries do not throw money at culture of own community, so the most of community did not learn the basic skills which are essential for living in a modern community, and it can have bad effect on status quo culture of rich countries. But we talked about knowledgeable and trained people. Obviously, it is harder to reach a level of knowledgeable in poor countries rather than rich countries. Whether they know the basic social skills or not, they could be taught easily.
Hope is the important thing in the world for poor people. That people live in a poor country casts a shadow on everything, after a while, they think they are not as good as their co-workers in rich countries. Only does thing save their motivation is hope to have a better life. So migration is only way to have better life for them. For having a trained workers must spent a lot of times and money.
The governments must spent money on schools and universities on their countries to have knowledgeable workers and experts, which means it takes along and need budget allocation. By giving this opportunity to skill workers and experts from other poor countries, they can gain a lot of trained workers instantly and without any paying money.
In conclusion, I think it is not fair to knowledgeable people who suffer due to their birth countries, and also those rich countries can have their workers without paying anything. So it seems both parties are delighted with this situation.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 11
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 84
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tely agree with this idea because it is a opportunity for people who come from un...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89710610932 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69948665733 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501607717042 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9354166311 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335920570626 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120456396933 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10352666923 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20995452346 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121120627144 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.