For Schoolchildren, Their Teachers Have More Influence On Their Intelligence And Social Development Than Their Parents. To What Extent Do You Agree Or Disagree?
Some people advocate that teachers can help students to improve their intelligence and social development better than parents. I strongly agree with this idea, since school students usually spend more time with their teachers rather than their parents and teachers also have adequate skills to deal with children, especially those in age of rebellion.
Nowadays, it cannot be denied that parents do not have much time with their children. Almost all of schools are day schools, as such, students regularly spend about 10 hours at schools with their teachers and only have a couple of hours for family. Let’s take me as an example; when I was 10 years old, almost all days except weekends, I was only at home in the evening. My family did not have much time to talk to each other because my parents were too busy with their deadlines and I always had tons of homework to be done before sleeping. In contrast, when I was at school, all teachers were likely to surround me all the time. They taught me how to solve hard exercises, organized games for students like us to cooperate and develop the friendship. Clearly, I did have a much better time at schools with my teachers.
Furthermore, parents cannot have such a good education skill as teachers. Normally, everyone who want to be a teacher in the future have to apply to a specialized university of education and must be trained so hard for 4 years with 2 periods of internship in practical education environment. My friend, for instance, is regularly fined by his father because he cannot understand what his father taught him to complete his homework. However, when he asks our teacher about those exercises, she explain it very understandably and extensively that my friend immediately understand the problems and finish all the exercises in 30 minutes. This example illustrates that teachers are always the best for the job of teaching and understanding their students.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that teachers have better influence on developing social relationship and intelligence of school students than parents.
- school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
- In recent years, the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK in 2009 100
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
... our teacher about those exercises, she explain it very understandably and extensively ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03693181818 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77056081532 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542613636364 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.298906907 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304565133035 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109201389685 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965031018302 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220567265576 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933152998027 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.