Schools should stop using books for teaching children as they find them boring, and use films, TV, and computers instead. To what extent do you agree with this?]
Many people hold a belief that educational institutions should utilize media equipment in teaching children instead of books. Nonetheless, from my perspective, it seems ungrounded for such these reasons:
The most important reason for this problem is that books provide an integral learning process to students from primary until they graduate from schools. Recently, plenty of studies have shown that although it is invisible, uncountable values from books, which have maintained human intellect for thousands of decades, contribute to the rise of the initiative in accumulating consciousness. Therefore, it will be a severe mistake to overlook the fact that factual information is summarised carefully in stock by papers. For instance, it can not disclaim that the government in Vietnam invested in education by the learning process in twelve grades, from the general discovery to the particular knowledge. The example is a demonstration that books are feasible in supplying natural and social cognition to the public.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this issue represents towards enhancing social media equipment convenience, concurrently mentioning the expansiveness of paperback investment. The argument seems suitable to some extent. However, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the matter related to imperfect information sources. For more specification, because of the facilitation in accessing various information on the network, pupils at puberty tend to watch individualism programs on televisions, take the same action on violent films and endeavor to show up themselves in the face of the public. As a result, they behave out of parents' wishes and schools. From that example, one may observe that the books take significant responsibility for the formation of students' behaviors.
In short, under no circumstances should people ignore the dedication of tomes and paperbacks in developing intellectual to students.
- People said that traveling to other places to learn new cultures Others argue that it is just only learned from books Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Travelling to other places is good to learn new cultures Some argue that it is just learning from books films and the Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Schools should stop using books for teaching children as they find them boring and use films TV and computers instead To what extent do you agree with this 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7186440678 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23807071915 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633898305085 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2408457586 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144348269321 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418141185916 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313536770281 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0780644216554 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322653875293 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.