Scientists believe that computers, not humans, will control cars in the near future. What are the reasons for that? Would this be a positive or a negative development?
Technology has brought a tremendous revolution in the field of automobile. Presently, it is believed by scientists that computer driven cars will come into existence in the years to come. As a result, the need of driving by human is likely to get disappeared. This essay intends to account for reasons behind this situation and mention it would be a positive development.
There are multifarious reasons behind this situation. First and foremost, artificial intelligence invented by advanced technology is responsible behind this situation. To demonstrate, artificial intelligence refers to replication of human intelligence in machines. Nowadays, advancement in technology has made it possible to get the features of cars functioned through verbal commands. No body would have ever imagined human voice will control the system installed in cars without manual instructions. More noticeably, advanced censors fitted in the cars are good enough to read the situation and act precisely without much human indications. This blesses human with immense comfort while sitting in the car without being worried for breaking road rules such as over speeding. The role of artifical technology in running of cars automatically is thus very clear.
Manifold positive outcomes for human beings can be put down in support of self control cars. Initially, the chances of accidents will decline swiftly under the presence of automatic cars. To be specific, nowadays, a healty number of accidents occur because of human indiscipline derived by drunken driving, over speed, stress of work as well as hurries of fast paced lifestyle. Automatic cars have self control over the system installed in cars. In the near future, the cars run by self operated technology are not likely to cause indiscipline such as rash driving and irresponsibility towards road rules. Taking this situation into consideration, it would not be wrong to say that self driven cars will take the safety standards to the next level. What is more, working human beings would be free from driving and they will be able to deal with other official works online sitting in the cars with great ease.
To recapitulate, driverless cars may snatch the jobs of drivers who earn their bread and butter through driving profession. However, I still believe that computer operated cars will come up with massive advantages for human beings. For this reason, I consider it a positive development.
- Some people are reducing their walks, however many health experts say that walking is thebest exercise to maintain health. Why do people walk less? What might encourage people to walk longer distances? 87
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it Others think that there are better ways to achieve it Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Many people spend a lot of time using communication technology What are the reasons for this What is the impact on the relationships with their families and other people 73
- Some people think that children should learn to obey and do as parents and teachers say. Others think that this kind of upbringing will not prepare our children for real life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobody'?
Suggestion: Nobody
...ars functioned through verbal commands. No body would have ever imagined human voice wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worried about'?
Suggestion: worried about
... while sitting in the car without being worried for breaking road rules such as over speedi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34366925065 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90200090942 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537467700258 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6812224422 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426859244901 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113664791181 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823970678087 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268623920936 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378906326965 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.