Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some languages are faced with extinction due to the small range of speakers. A group of people believes that governments should allocate some budget to preserve these languages while others suppose it would not be effective and no use. For me, minority languages preservation is worthy.
Many clams are given to convince the nonsense of rare languages protection. It will cost a great amount of money for maintaining the languages. Government has to invest a lot in order to socialize them, like: making them become a compulsory subject at school, doing a lots of public announcement, ect. Instead, the money could be saved for other important matters.
On the other hand, many people believe that it is necessary for us to preserve the minority languages. Languages is the most important part of culture. It has a distinctive value that can be indispensable. More over, languages are also an identity of a country. When a language dies out, one culture will disappear. Therefore, it is important for governments to take some efforts in maintaining rare languages, though the cost of preserving them might be considered as expensive.
In conclusion, although both views have their own positive sides, I personally believe that people should protect the diversity of languages.
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish 56
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
... given to convince the nonsense of rare languages protection. It will cost a great amount...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...e a compulsory subject at school, doing a lots of public announcement, ect. Instead, t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21256038647 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95624544824 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628019323671 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2996205856 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0714285714 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304865168512 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928725047763 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710648267947 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175899310354 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059488529261 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.