Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss and gi

Regional languages are becoming more and more uncommon nowadays. There are hundreds of regional languages in India with thousands of dialects but due to the decreasing number of native speakers of these languages, many are on the brink of extinction, if not already bygone. It is argued that the government should play an active role in saving their existence by allowing funds for their promotion whereas many see this as a blatant waste of public money. This essay will shed light on both these opinions and make an argument for government backing for the purpose of reviving these languages.

Government should come to the forefront to rescue many regional languages which are facing extinction if we want to preserve our identity. Regional languages are an inseparable part of the cultural and heritage of local people and are therefore irreplaceable and invaluable. Thus, the administration must provide adequate funds so that their revival is construed by various methods of mass promotion. For instance, many ancient Indian scriptures and holy books were originally wriiten 'Pali' language which is now extinct. Naturally, such holy books could not be properly translated to modern languages and as such we may never know what treasuresare still lying hidden in them waiting to be deciphered. Hence, we shoud not let such situations happen again in future.

On the other hand, several people would not be in favour of spending public money on saving regional languages as they are of the opinion that although it is painful to see languages become obscure, public funds are too limited to be spend on such endeavours rather than being used for solving big glaring issues faced by the State such as population explosion, poverty, crime, joblessness, environental pollution and the like.

In conclusion, this essay would like to state that although regional languages serve no real purpose in bulding our economy, they must be safeguarded from extinction because they are fundamental to our identity and the connection that people have to their roots. As such, it becomes the State's duty to do its part in the struggle to keep our languages alive.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun see seems to be countable; consider using: 'many sees'.
Suggestion: many sees
...owing funds for their promotion whereas many see this as a blatant waste of public money...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ud not let such situations happen again in future. On the other hand, several people w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal languages as they are of the opinion that although it is painful to see langu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72007120265 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575498575499 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.0180996576 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257127610791 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762193930739 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639690338062 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156135042582 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558384994346 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.