Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomenon of companies decision making and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that involving personnel in it are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that engaging all staff in this process can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a managers standpoint, decision making can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that job satisfaction, as well as their spirit, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a sense of belonging. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both demanding job and managerial skill apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of firms, employees cooperation might increase the consequences of coordinating. Moreover, fundamental aspects of modern workplaces relate to this reality that the demerits of relationship pertain to the horizontal organization. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the vertical level is correlated negatively with efficiency. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of hierarchy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of job demand far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of operational skill prove the significance of teamwork, but also pinpoint company future implications.
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...that throughout this essay. From a managers standpoint, decision making can provide...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69758064516 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33940843163 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8229611333 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108863039197 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328327134747 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418547292668 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561601110899 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346889961668 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.