World sources are not adequate for this planet’s population which is increasing day-to-day. I think, welfare level of countries is depends on to the government and they must procure all requirements to their compatriots. Rich countries are not compulsory for supporting the poor ones.
Major nations of the world have several advantages such as education, health facilities, food & beverages supplies and even electricity. Developing and third world countries, by contrast, are not acquire to these sources because of myriad reason and of course people of this countries are not deserve poor conditions. Nevertheless, wealthy states are not obligated to donate their revenues and other abundances instead of improving their own technology and economy. Poorness of some country is not other state’s guilt.
It is true to be say the responsibility of support humanitarian needs to their citizens is belong to the governments. They should provide every kind of necessities to young and old alike. Moreover, the administration is put into power by citizen for this reason, in other words, for look after their people. It is their duty and if necessery, by the help of the countries’ people, the nation should be develop. When the stattesman live the life in the money by effortlessly and the citizens cannot find anyting to eat or drink, then there is an error in this country.
In conclude, a country should be a whole and all person in it, should have close to each other level of life as much as. So, government shall supply resources to their citizens, not wealthy countries.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- IELTS 6 Test 1 Writing Task 2 Academic You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are s 61
- the chart below shows the information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house price in summarize the information by reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd they must procure all requirements to their compatriots. Rich countries are no...
^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acquired'.
Suggestion: acquired
...d world countries, by contrast, are not acquire to these sources because of myriad reas...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f myriad reason and of course people of this countries are not deserve poor conditio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deserved'.
Suggestion: deserved
...course people of this countries are not deserve poor conditions. Nevertheless, wealthy ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...humanitarian needs to their citizens is belong to the governments. They should provide...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developed'?
Suggestion: developed
...countries’ people, the nation should be develop. When the stattesman live the life in t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, third, i think, kind of, of course, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16279069767 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93598817012 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7728091929 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1428571429 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251078154157 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804460035276 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693440362396 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138780306323 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655081798483 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.