Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth with poor countries by providing such things as food and education? Or, it is the responsibility of the government of poorer countries to look after their citizens themselves?
It is often argued that rich countries should help the poorer countries by supporting such thing as food and education. While I agree with this idea, I believe that the government of underdeveloped countries should be responsible for the development themselves
On one hand, I agree that wealthy countries should share their wealth with indigent nations for some reasons. Firstly, it is obvious that it enable for the poor countries to accelerate the development process of nations. This means that rich nations can help the poorer countries by some ways, such as technology- transfer, providing a good education system for children, giving scholarship to students and just to name a few. As a result, poorer countries will have a great generation who will make contribution to the development of nations in the future. In addition, the wealthy countries can benefit from assistance the poorer countries. For example, the poor country like Viet Nam often gets non refundable aid to buidt a highway and street from Japan government. With that help, Japan companies are always welcome to invest in industrial construction and received the low tax policy from Vietnam government.
On the other hand, I believe that the indigent nations should be accountable for their development themselves. It allows poorer nations do not rely much on wealthy nations to develop local economies. They can raise the public’s awareness on getting out of poverty. For example, Vietnam government sponsor citizen to take step to starting a small business or provide a right policy to encourage people who wants to open a farm. Thus, these policies can improve people living standard in the future.
Conclusion I agree that rich countries should assist the poorer nations, but the indigent countries should make an effort to get rid of poverty by themselves first.
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and interpersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagr 40
- Many schools ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you think it is a good idea? Give reasons and details to support your idea. 59
- Do you agree with the following statement? Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child’s success in life. 56
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 83
Sentence: Firstly, it is obvious that it enable for the poor countries to accelerate the development process of nations.
Description: The fragment it enable for is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace enable with verb, past tense
can benefit from assistance the poorer countries
can benefit from assisting the poorer countries
It allows poorer nations do not rely much on wealthy nations
It allows poorer nations not to rely much on wealthy nations
people who wants to open a farm
people who want to open a farm
Sentence: For example, the poor country like Viet Nam often gets non refundable aid to buidt a highway and street from Japan government.
Error: buidt Suggestion: built
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 298 350
No. of Characters: 1512 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.155 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.074 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.119 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.366 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.366 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5