Should wealthy nations be required to share their
wealth among poorer nations by providing such things
as food and education? Or us it the responsibility of
the governments of poorer nations to look after their
citizens themselves
I think that wealthy nations should share their
prosperous resources with the poorly nations to
improve their living by offering food and education.
Reasons to share their wealth are:
• To Build up humanity
• To Improve friendship in neighbouring countries
• To save the lives of people
Whenever famine hits the country, it wipes out all
their crops and let the people suffer from starvation.
One such example is Somalia where people died like
flies under starvation. It is the duty of other nations
to support their cause by providing food in their need.
Thus it keeps the humanity alive and pass on to the
next generation. It inspires others to be humane.
In case of undeveloped countries, it is not easy to
provide quality education to youngsters by their
government. Thus the developed nations should lend
them the way for their studies. Since youth is the
backbone of their land, it is inevitable for them to
acquire proper graduation. This builds up healthy
relationship between provinces as they are benefited
by their nearest countries.
Sharing should not be stopped with food and education
alone. It includes saving the lives of people when the
nearby country faces the natural calamities. In those
situations , it is important to send their troops to the
affected territory in order to reduce the casualties.
The required medical support should be dispatched to
treat the wounded people.
I conclude that sharing to the needy people is the
best way to spend the money as it replinish the dying
humanity and creates the bonding between countries.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 56
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minu 100
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 84
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...cause by providing food in their need. Thus it keeps the humanity alive and pass on...
^^^^
Line 19, column 13, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ion to youngsters by their government. Thus the developed nations should lend them...
^^^^
Line 29, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...natural calamities. In those situations , it is important to send their troops to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, thus, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24521072797 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62586820825 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4602759417 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.13333333333 7.06120827912 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 32.0 4.38176352705 730% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177837980422 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653678874922 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756187096175 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440330805432 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721889591459 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.