Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

It is often considered by some that, strict punishment or beating would be beneficial for the children to develop discipline. Children needs to be get certain corrections to follow rules and regulations to behave mannerly and civility. However, in my opinion, smacking would may lead to detrimental effect on children's mind rather than the positive outcome and thereby in this essay disagree with the statement.

To begin with, slapping often make wounds in pupils mind and which lead to behavioural problems and presumably subliminal cruelty. In other words, getting hurt in front of others make shame and enable to cope with such situations in many children. Such feelings may produce deleterious impacts on character, attitude to others, and zing as well. For instance, juvenile home member confess during counselling that, he opted to get severe smacking from the parents for the simple mistake he made and that would tend to become violent in the later life. Moreover, even smacking considered as a child abuse in many child protective agencies, and they often emerging the deal of severity of punishment rather than the care and teach to correct in peaceful manner.

Similarly, make use of beating for all the mistakes done by the children often make diminish self esteem and unlikely produce the feeling of fear and fail to follow innovative areas. In brief, continuous physical harassment may lead to confusion and inability to try different things by the fact of parental or care givers behaviour. For example, there was a film in Indian film industry who got profound smacking and awkwardness by the father make the hero in a criminal. Owing to the fact that, an inborn talent in mechanical art facts would be mitigated and the hero represent as a failure among other siblings.

To sum up, mild punishment would be cherish for the pupils future in a splendid way. Since, in my perspective, irrelevent physical punishment irrespective of matter of mistake aptly lead to negative effect in children's mind

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'correcting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: correcting
...nishment rather than the care and teach to correct in peaceful manner. Similarly, make ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iminish self esteem and unlikely produce the feeling of fear and fail to follow i...
^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m industry who got profound smacking and awkwardness by the father make the hero ...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a splendid way" with adverb for "splendid"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... would be cherish for the pupils future in a splendid way. Since, in my perspective, irrelevent ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay. Since, in my perspective, irrelevent physical punishment irrespective of matt...
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spective of matter of mistake aptly lead to negative effect in childrens mind
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in brief, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10876132931 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70518123139 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3452829379 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.785714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0837173536109 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296494884937 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269690368971 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0556652006287 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343189582849 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.