The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

An advertisement has become an extremely controversial subject recently. Some advocates believe that contemporary society would find it advantageous to illegalize all modes of advertisement. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the banning of any forms of advertising.

Some proponents think that a ban should be implemented on adverts. This may be derived from the idea that; advertisement could potentially be a waste of time, money and resources. For instance, take smoking as an example. Even though every packet of cigarette illustrates: ‘smoking is injurious to health’, with an additional disturbing image of a throat or lung cancer, people continue the habit of smoking and take no heed to the message being delivered. Thus, people believe advertisement expenses could be used in other aspects of society that could be more useful.

In contrast, an advertisement could bring about considerable benefits to society. Advertising is a form of promotion, hence, people could be made more aware of charitable organizations such as homeless children or cancer relief charities. This provides awareness to those that may wish to contribute to financially helping those in need. For example, research carried out in the UK suggested that the number of donations substantially increased after a television advertisement of a homeless children organization. Therefore, these forms of advertisements could be significantly beneficial for society.

After considering the reasons some people would advocate the banning of advertisement. I wholeheartedly disagree with initiating the ban. As discussed in this essay, there are some remarkable positive aspects of advertisements such as realization of the helpless people in the society that might need financial aid.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gnificantly beneficial for society. After considering the reasons some people wou...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71052631579 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44081090969 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1946102941 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250063569903 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798836936566 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443405706311 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146481053916 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264010878572 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.