Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion

In the salad days of millennium, society is polarized into two groups almost equally regarding the notion that whether trusts should fund people living in its own country or in which they do not belong. Different people have their distinct mindset. T0he following paragraph would shed light on both the approaches before making the final note.

To commence with first notion, there are numerous things to be shared in its favour. First and foremost, foundation's funding should be depend upon the monetary worth it has, if it is well enough to feed other nations then they should. As a result, there are many organisations like WHO i.e World Health Organisation which actively supports the country that is destitute in terms of health care. Secondly, countries that stands among first few ranks in development should help other countries grow. Consequently, they should make rest of nation equally heighten for the sake of humanity.

Shifting over the second school of thoughts, if a country do not generate funds that are adequate for there own survival. Hence, they should only contribute the indigenous people. Moreover, if the charity is presented by the minimal network , they should only support those families who are really facing poverty conditions .

Having discussed the arguments and counter arguments, I would like to infer that organisation which have collection more than enough may help other nations.

Hammering the last nail, I personally feel that a foundations should assist other nations that are indeed in search of subsidy. .

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'depended'?
Suggestion: depended
...foremost, foundations funding should be depend upon the monetary worth it has, if it i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...ot generate funds that are adequate for there own survival. Hence, they should only contr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rity is presented by the minimal network , they should only support those families...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly support those families who are really facing poverty conditions . Having di...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ho are really facing poverty conditions . Having discussed the arguments and c...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a foundation' or simply 'foundations'?
Suggestion: a foundation; foundations
...g the last nail, I personally feel that a foundations should assist other nations that are in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that are indeed in search of subsidy. .
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...are indeed in search of subsidy. .
^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... indeed in search of subsidy. .
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27822580645 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59193278954 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657258064516 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.924593301 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.692307692 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253266305626 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807993274785 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571882859419 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120438150926 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421411701825 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.