Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is Should this be taught in schools
There is an opinion saying that children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school. In my opinion, one of the factors that help a child become a leader in the future is capable of presentations skills to convince the crowd. Therefore, the children need to know to present their problems with their parents, their teachers, and their friends. There are 2 benefits that the children will get from teaching to give speeches and presentations in school.
Firstly, presentation skills help children become more confident in communicating. Public speaking is considered one of the greatest fears of humans. Helping children overcome their fear of themselves will be a preparation to overcome the difficulties in their life. The children will gradually talk less stumbling, raise their hands confidently to express their thoughts in the classroom, and be ready to engage in healthy debates when necessary.
Secondly, presentation skills help children develop better thinking. The world-famous inventor and mathematician Pascal said: “Eloquence is a painting of the thoughts”. In the process of building presentations, a coherent system of thinking and logic was formed and developed. Therefore, learning and practicing presentation skills help children to rehearse and develop their logical thinking ability. Consequently, this is the basic process for forming super thinking later.
In conclusion, teaching children presentation skills is extremely important. If the children develop early presentation skills, they will be more confident in communicating and develop better thinking. As a result, they can be more confident and successful in their future study and their working environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'giving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: giving
...hat the children will get from teaching to give speeches and presentations in school. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, therefore, as for, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68482490272 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15413274083 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517509727626 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5733704697 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.3125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260460716434 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992297517566 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143450901406 0.0667982634062 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161651646879 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108500363785 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.