Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the digital age, it is widely acknowledged that technology play an important role in human life and activities. Given their importance, how to use technology as effective as we can to benefit our society has been a much-debated topic. While some people argue that modern technology is widening the gap between rich and poor people, others disagree with this notion. I side with the former view

On the one hand, it is understandable why some people say that the poor can take advantages of modern devices. Thanks to technology, anyone from any parts of the world can access the Internet, which could turn rags into riches. This likely to be attributable to educational materials and information that might help them develop themselves. For example, nowadays have lots of people from lower and middle class learn how to play the stock market on the Internet and without school training, they have changed their own life and bridge the rich poor gap.

On the other hand, I believe the gap between wealthy and poor people is extended by modern technology. Automation is the most common reason when it may undermines humans' place with the fact that it could perform tasks that required copious amounts of human labor. As a result, less work opportunities are available for impoverished people. Take United State for instance, low-wage workers are susceptible to job loss and wage depression due to automation. Furthermore, technologies are costly and not every citizen can afford it. For example, such issues raised when school were closed because of the pandemic and the poor were not able to buy smartphones for children to attend online classes. This is a testament to how modern equipment could not make the gap between fortunate and unfortunate people smaller.

In conclusion, although modern technological advancements is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, it's also beneficial to the people who is in the lower classes.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-26 baothw 92 view
2021-11-26 baothw 73 view
2021-02-15 Narges.s 78 view
2020-10-10 sharmaisha 73 view
2018-06-11 faruke 77 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...turn rags into riches. This likely to be attributable to educational materials an...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on is the most common reason when it may undermines humans place with the fact th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09034267913 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76172045875 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595015576324 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6004993723 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320243051182 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1039437938 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131188723393 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206624525611 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663901238859 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.