Some businesses find that their new employee lack in basic interpersonal skills such as the lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes and suggest possible solution. Also provide relevant example from your experience
It is incontrovertible fact that soft skills such as communication, teamwork, leadership are essential for everyone. The given topic asserts that some time those, new workers who are hiring by companies, They cannot get along well their colleagues also, they have not soft skills. This essay exams the possible reasons of this trend and suggest some practical policies to curb this problem.
To embark with there are plethora of reasons why the new employees have deficiency in such basic interpersonal skills. The first is that when a company are hiring the people they are mainly focused on technical skills and ability of this people as the soft skill. Secondly, in this competition era, the Educational Institutes mostly in emphasis on technical learning and theoretical education. For example, a survey conducted by British university 50% of people have not soft skill due to the lack of teamwork and group discussion in some schools. Last but not the least, there are no any way to get access to interpersonal skill of people. That is why, many of new workers lack in basic skills.
There is almost no one solution to this problem often given the complexity of its causes. However, one option has to be to companies should train their employees after, hiring for jobs. To instance, they can organise meeting and can start some teamwork project where, the workers get chance to speak openly. In this way they can build up their basic skills. Moreover, the educational system should merge some group activities because, this school is best place to make the people perfect in every skill.
In conclusion , I pen down to say that the companies and workers should go hand in hand to sort out this issue. Because, to mitigate this obstacle is not easy task for alone companies or organisation
- Some people think that the environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve while others think that the government cannot solve theSe environmental problems unless individuals make some action. 73
- Sone people like to spent money on look, fashion,cars and other things. Whereas, other are save money for their future endeavours. Discuss both sides. 56
- Computers translate language very quickly. Learning language is wastage of time. Do you agree or diagree 67
- The tables beliw shows the distribution of students at UK university by mode of study and gender 88
- Some people think that school should educate pupils according to their academic abilities, others believe that pupils with different abilities should educate together. Discuss the both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...used on technical skills and ability of this people as the soft skill. Secondly, in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ools. Last but not the least, there are no any way to get access to interpersonal ...
^^
Line 9, column 448, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...e group activities because, this school is best place to make the people perfect in eve...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make the people perfect in every skill. In conclusion , I pen down to say that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ect in every skill. In conclusion , I pen down to say that the companies an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98675496689 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6392531068 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6078881571 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177326184716 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610138579231 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525630427098 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101907425574 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744332252461 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.