Some children can learn more efficiently by watching tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree?
Television nowadays plays an vital role in daily life as a marked milestone. Watching TV can support children to broaden their knowledge and they will not be behind the time, I completely agree with this idea.
On the one hand, although watching tv is beneficial, there are still some drawbacks of television that affect the development of children. First of all, children attempt to explore the variety of sources on television. However, many of them contain some detrimental information. For instance, when children open some TV programs which are not in accordance with their age such as violent. Secondly, in many circumstances if kids get addicted to television, they will be at risk or lost their cognitive skills. According to the analysis of many scientists, children do not have enough ability to recognize the dark side of these technologies.
On the other hand, TVs bring benefits to encourage the innovation of children. Based on the diversity of details on the television, children can get familiar with the world. For instance, there are thousand of programs which provide essential skills to the development of children. In addition, in the school televisions can be used to help kids think about the visual images instead of theories. For example, after teachers provide information for children, they may use TVs as tools in order to understand more about these specific circumstances.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that there are still some drawbacks of televisions, I strongly agree that children should watch TV regularly in their routine life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-29 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-23 | kookiiejeon | 56 | view |
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree? 73
- 06/6/2015: Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it, however, others prefer to give money to the national or international charities, discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, car and other items. Why is it? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- Government should ban abortion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 11
- Task 2: The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices are harmful to individual and to the society they live in. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Television nowadays plays an vital role in daily life as a marked mi...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lent. Secondly, in many circumstances if kids get addicted to television, they wi...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...with the world. For instance, there are thousand of programs which provide essential ski...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... programs which provide essential skills to the development of children. In addit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91247169076 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.187931769 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328711833361 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105487222972 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854364695573 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210908391254 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633329697539 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.