In recent years, people have used cars as a means of transportation, which actually emits a great amount of carbon, so our air quality has worsened. The government thinks that stopping those private vehicles from entering the city center might be a good way to make our air quality better. In my opinion, this idea is completely infeasible despite some benefits.
Admittedly, there is no doubt that this policy can indeed reduce air pollution because driving less on the road will contribute to fewer carbon dioxide emissions. According to a report released by a city expert group in 2018, one liter of gasoline will produce approximately 2.67 kilograms of carbon dioxide, while current cars generally consume about 8 liter of fuel for 100 kilometres. There are about 10,000 vehicles in Vancouver, and each person travels about 30 kilometres per day. The total carbon emissions per day are about 60,000 kg. If private vehicles are banned from entering urban districts, we will reduce carbon emissions by about 60,000 kg. However, this does not necessarily imply that the move towards a vehicle-free city is utterly workable.
In fact, restricting all vehicle travels will severely increase the burden on public transportation because there is a surge in the number of new commuters who once depended on driving their cars to work or school. If the government cannot provide alternative methods of transportation for thousands of people to enter the city, the existing public transport and facilities will be overwhelmed. For example, it is not possible to simply add additional bus services in Rome, as most of them need to enter and exit the city during peak hours. As a result, the prohibition of driving in the city center will result in more protests and inconvenience.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that restricting all private cars is an unwise idea. Although this eco-friendly proposal helps create a less polluted city, it increases the burden on the public transport system and the poor. Hence, it is justifiable to argue that the government should take the negative effects into consideration before the implementation of this policy.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what exatent do you agree or disagree 93
- Many government think that economic progress is their most important goal.some people,however,think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these veiws and give own opinion? 89
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84462044404 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598337950139 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2590033214 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1875 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237402317996 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701077120639 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447911277701 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126231227441 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382255949092 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.