Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinion regarding competitiveness among men and women differs widely. Some believe that women are less competitive than naturally competitive men. I disagree with this statement, as I believe that both men and women are similar in terms of competitiveness.
Men and women have been competing to survive or to achieve their goals. Almost in all aspects of life in today’s world can be seen that both men and women share an almost similar quality of competitiveness. In business, for instance, both men and women have been competing with each other to reach their goals. These business competitions have proven that both men and women have a similar chance of success. This means that the idea of women being less superior to participate in the competition with their counterparts is untrue as women are like men having extensive qualities to compete with their counterparts and to achieve their life goals.
It is undoubtedly true that people are born with different levels of competitive quality. However, there is no exact evidence proving men are highly equipped with this quality, meanwhile women do not. What makes it different is how this quality is developed and trained. These two factors highly determine who is better between men and women in terms of competitiveness. Male and female professional athletes, for instance, are equally competitive. Both male and female athletes have been participating in a high level of competition and this is evidence that both sexes are equally competitive.
To sum up, although there are many people consider that male have better quality in terms of competitiveness both male and female are equipped with an equal level of competitiveness.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You 73
- The map below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative trend 61
- The table below gives information about the daily cost of water per person in five different countries Figures are based on the minimum daily requirement per peron of 11 5 litres 73
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat both sexes are equally competitive. To sum up, although there are many peopl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21978021978 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0088760266 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465201465201 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7672371899 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232391593791 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102652074389 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945058656476 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160401896532 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119430307309 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.