Some corporations create a standard dress code for their employees to be worn at the workplace. The main benefits of uniforms are a positive attitude towards work and equality between workers, but the main drawbacks are time-consumption and discomfort involved.
Wearing a uniform affects positively on the behavior of employees. This is to say that when putting it on, it creates a greater affinity with work by giving individuals a feeling that they are at work and they all have a shared responsibility to strive for one goal. Another positive of having a standard is that it offers a sense of equality and commonality among co-workers. Sticking to the same dress at work eliminates the division among staff members based on what they wear and builds cohesion by instilling the sense that we all are the same. For example, the unity of Sri Lankan health care workers, including doctors, nurses, and technicians, increased remarkably after wearing the same uniform during the Covid-19 pandemic.
However, it takes longer to change uniforms. In other words, because many companies do not allow their employees to wear standard clothing outside the premises, people have to put them on and off at the workplace, which consumes the time they work. Another negative of adopting a uniform is that it is not comfortable to be in that dress all day. Put simply, uniforms are designed without considering the nature of work involved and the number of working hours causing inconvenience to the workers. For instance, the uniform of air-hostess of the Sri Lankan airlines is the traditional “osariya”, which is a tight attire, and that is why the company has recently decided to change it.
In conclusion, setting up a uniform at the workplace persuades employees to work and creates strong bonds among staff members. However, it takes a lot of time and uncomfortable to work if it has not been designed prudently.
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 61
- The given maps show condition of Felixstone in 1967 and in 2001 73
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cites in the same week in May 2007 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 87
- Some people think parents should supervise their children s activity closely while others believe that children should have more freedom discuss both views and give your own opinion 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06624605678 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90265049435 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536277602524 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8764289346 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344442421661 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104587454989 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540403976743 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200971940989 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551806784342 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.