Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Hitherto, the globalization has led to many ways of managing employee credos, and the question of whether the old must have their flexibility in the working’s age or not has been raising public attention. While many people lament that the old generation are able to decide their retirement’s time, I oppose this view by giving some rational evidences.
First and foremost, it is conspicuous that old people are experienced workers, they can use their knowledge to contribute to their companies without wasting time to learn at the beginning as the youth. Furthermore, the government should respect old people because of their contribution to the country’s economics and give working opportunities to them, not only to benefit the economy but also be an epitomi for the young labourers about working spirit.
Beside these aforementioned benefits, there are tons of foreseeable drawbacks of elder staffs, work productivity is the uppermost issue that we can not ignore. Everything has its own breakpoint as well as human beings, old people can not work productively like the youth due to their brains which are going to reach limitations. This will deter their companies from gaining profit and affect not only the economics but also a country’s industry. A vivid example is that in Japan in this day and age, the old dominate almost all jobs, so Japan’s government must need the support of young labourers from different parts of the world and pay for it. On top of that, if this problem keeps occurring, there will be a huge shortage of job opportunities for the prevailing adolescents in the whole world and heighten the unemployment rate.
In conclusion, it is no way that the benefits of letting old labourer own-decide when to retire outweigh those in drawbacks
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or to use animal products for example clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...y ways of managing employee credos, and the question of whether the old must have their flexibility in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ything has its own breakpoint as well as human beings, old people can not work pr...
^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an’s government must need the support of young labourers from different parts of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09931506849 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93507935882 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.441729171 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.9 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195728380257 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736336953663 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039582905195 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117676017813 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323225594977 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.