In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Obesity is a growing concern in many parts of world due to the excessive intake of fast food and that can result in various fatal diseases such as cancer, tumor and respiratory diseases. Imposing junk food tax has two sides of influence onto people’s preferences on foods, which can be able to maintain one’s healthy diet program by maintaining healthy eating habits, whereas this side effect is failure of programs. In my perspective, while I understand the fatal potential risk for continuous junk food intake, the stimulus tastes. Therefore, the wise consumption should be recommended.
To begin with, the junk food tax can immediately reduce the junk food consumption. After the imposing of tax on fast food, the average price of foods will be increased and this price would be similar to other meals that are available at a restaurant. Since fast foods have insufficient nutrient values, people could obtain more valuable and rich substances of nutrient foods from other restaurants so they can manage their eating habit. Improvised taxation systems on fast food will lead a less eating habit due to the sustain satisfaction. Thus, it can reduce the junk food consumption.
In contrast, fast food which influences on human’s health is leading to fatal maladies because inclusive of chemical substances within, thus some experts claim that such food should be taxed highly. The accumulation of such high carbohydrate and cholesterol substances within one’s body is unknown but the past studies have discovered that this lead to several chronic, respiratory and cell destruction. For example, the National Centre for Health Statistics stated that, the percentage of Americans with chronic illness jumped from 7% to 13% in just 9 years during the fast foods being popular. Also, food allergies in children rose from 2.4% to 5.1% from 1997 to 2011. From this research, we can conclude that the junk foods can directly effect on human’s health.’
In conclusion, fast foods have several benefits related to cheaper price and convenient availability despite the critical health issues. Therefore, the amount of intake of fast foods should be monitored and watched closely to prevent any other potential health risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sakil | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | xa1en | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | nhaothuy | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2006 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period. 67
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the amount of sales for four different kinds of foods in supermarkets in four different cities in America. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 515, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...od will lead a less eating habit due to the sustain satisfaction. Thus, it can reduce the j...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly effect on human's health.' In conclusion, fast foods have several b...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.299760191847 0.247107183377 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.1103117506 0.155533422707 71% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112709832134 0.0946595960268 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0359712230216 0.0501214627716 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0143884892086 0.0437548338989 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127098321343 0.122226691241 104% => OK
Participles: 0.031175059952 0.0403226058552 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82268011649 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0287769784173 0.0326793684256 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0647482014388 0.0861772015684 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0335731414868 0.021408717616 157% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00719424460432 0.011925033212 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2247.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 316.048096192 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31179775281 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387640449438 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306179775281 0.28420135186 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205056179775 0.203846283523 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148876404494 0.137316102897 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82268011649 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.037074148 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 65.9859641885 60.7387585426 109% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7333333333 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1193331912 49.517814964 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 127.492653851 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 54.3513108614 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 2.85074626866 1.69124875643 169% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316422231821 0.332605444948 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106350007502 0.102741220458 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.038883572142 0.0668466124924 58% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.514583153723 0.534860350844 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118312030549 0.148594505496 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13735582891 0.134430193775 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585052855322 0.0742795772207 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.357173956904 0.324371583561 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0381810213606 0.0638462369009 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228981183688 0.228012699653 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03183838574 0.058150111329 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.