In a number of nations, most people believe that renting homes is a tendency instead of trying to work to purchase a house. While I agree that this trend may be problematic, the overall impacts have been tremendously beneficial.
The downsides of renting a home are irrefutable. Initially, living in a rented house is temporary, which can annoy people due to the host's management. In fact, there is a wide range of constraints for people renting a home due to the fact that they can be controlled by what they tend to do with their house, such as decoration and what time they want to go back to their house. As a result, this will lead to restrictions on the individual's hope. Moreover, the way of life can result in some extra fees in addition to the cost of renting a residence. Apparently, while buying a house constitutes having open space for parking or laundry in a rented dwelling, you ought to allocate payments to these things and even money for security in your living areas. Although this fee is not wasteful, it is still an ongoing concern for various people, especially students living on tight budgets.
On the one hand, I opine that there are numerous tangible advantages of this tendency. Admittedly, it will be considered a flexible lifestyle if an individual lives in rented houses. Obviously, not most of the time, the location of the house is consistent with the situation of the public accommodating it. This is due to the tendency of changing work; typically, in young generation associated with varying their accommodation. Consequently, this has left its mark on their movement, in a case the house bought by them is far new workplace. Conversely, it is not a problem for a rented house that helps people move to another place conveniently. Additionally, renting a house tends to relieve the financial pressure on each person. In recent years, the payment to purchase a home has become more and more grossly inflated, so a person ought to spend half of their life working hard to buy only a dwelling. Therefore, renting a residence can be more salutary which facilitates people to invest money in other aspects such as healthcare, recreation, or education instead of only buying a house.
In conclusion, from my personal perspective, despite acknowledging the potential drawbacks of renting houses, I believe it to be a welcome development that assists people to change their jobs and decrease their financial strain.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO RENT THEIR HOMES RATHER THAN BUYING THEM WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RANTING A HOME 67
- The tables below give the distribution of world population in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pictures below shows process of growing and making products from pineapples 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hosts'' or 'host's'?
Suggestion: hosts'; host's
...rary, which can annoy people due to the hosts management. In fact, there is a wide ra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, conversely, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92530120482 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9259541559 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546987951807 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5269188561 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.578947368 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24730938322 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727570948349 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599635036122 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1468409073 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328819910133 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hosts'' or 'host's'?
Suggestion: hosts'; host's
...rary, which can annoy people due to the hosts management. In fact, there is a wide ra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, conversely, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92530120482 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9259541559 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546987951807 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5269188561 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.578947368 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24730938322 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727570948349 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599635036122 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1468409073 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328819910133 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.