In some countries, prison is the most common solution to the problems of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people with better education so that they do not become criminals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Crime prevention has long been a top priority of governments worldwide. Although imprisonment remains the most common form of punishment, a more practical and far-reaching approach to tackling crime is arguably to be found in education.
Doubtless, there are grounds for maintaining some form of prison system. It is generally argued that incarcerating criminals acts to reduce the incidence of reoffending by warning the public against the consequences of illegal activities. Offenders being punished also offers a sense of justice to victims or their families, while criminals themselves are allowed the opportunity to rehabilitate in prison. However, this type of punishment fails to directly address the root causes of crime and might even cause released offenders, due to the limitations of a criminal record and a lack of employable skills, to reoffend after release.
Hence, providing quality education may be a more feasible approach to tackling crime. Equal access to education and investment in educational services are important not only to the personal and professional growth of each individual, but they also offer the opportunity to foster a sense of social responsibility and compliance, thus reducing the need to indulge in illegal activity. Such individuals, equipped with employable skills to obtain a decent job, can work toward achieving a decent living standard. In this way, the benefits of education are not limited to solving crime alone but also extends to society in general, and thus acts as a more successful method of prevention.
In conclusion, the strong correlation between education and crime suggests that investment in developing a more equitable education system is a much more practical and long-term solution to crime prevention compared with imprisonment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-30 | Dr.Diago Tran | 39 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | huonglo | 67 | view |
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a companyor organization. Why might this be the case? What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 56
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 95
- Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences. Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57246376812 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14446625549 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615942028986 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5074647558 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.818181818 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18131490175 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631787215329 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496399520166 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11003475023 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454367812393 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.