In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. which do you think is appropriate today’s world?
In modern society, people now have different opinions about education. I partly agree that students should learn various skills from science to art, however, I believe to focus on a few of subjects is more useful than studying a variety of subjects.
Learning many subjects have some positive effects on pulpils. Firstly, having a wide range of classes enable students to become more willing to study. Particularly, some students in secondary school often think studying is boring and they would rather spend time on video games with friends. If schools provide more subjects for students, they are more likely to feel curious of knowledge and find the subjects which they are interested in. Secondly, people who have a large number of different professional skills have the huge advantage in this modern society. Compared with the society in the past, business market becomes gradually competitive because of globalisation and companies and governments have the huge demand of people who have different professional skills.
On the other hand, I believe studying few subjects in a particular field is more suitable for students. most scholars spend several decades on a single issue because It is not easy to be specialized with a professional skill. As a result, the child who wants to be a scientist should spend their time on chemistry or physics. They do not need to waste time on irrelevant classes such as music or art. Also, to force pupils to learn the subjects which they have no talent in is harmful to their academic performance. Children who are not good at expression often feel extremely difficult to study foreign languages. They might be painful and eventually be tired of studying.
In conclusion, although learning various subjects can encourage students to study and become more competitive in the future, I still argue that a student should focus on a narrow range of subjects to have domain knowledge in a specialized field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | rednivaralat | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | minoomrd | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
- The workplace nowadays is trying to employ the equal number of females and males Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 83
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 61
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us all want to do the same and look the same. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think it is effective for students to study in groups on school while others think it is better to study alone. Discuss the both sides and give your own opinion. 78
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. which do you think is appropriate today’s world? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nterested in. Secondly, people who have a large number of different professional skills have the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...ar field is more suitable for students. most scholars spend several decades on a sin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11875 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73986769754 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5303308742 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130200136685 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422684114971 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395478242936 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830249784993 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286367416788 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.