In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
Over the past decades, business shopping has never failed to have public attention and sparks controversies. Although the tendency of people driving to large out-of-town stores is currently increasing, the issue as to whether people without cars have limited access to suburbs stores remains controversial. As far as I am concerned, we cannot deny some of the benefits of this issue which will be analyzed in this essay.
Firstly, it is important to recognize that since real-estate prices are remarkable lower than in city centers, supermarkets located in suburbs have lower operational expenses. As a result, customers are provided with high quality products for more competitive price tags thus saving money for other household costs. Secondly, because a shopping trip to the outskirts could be a family bonding activity, so people who go shopping in wholesale stores are more likely to go with at least another family member due to the fact there are more items that need carrying.
Thirdly, it is equally important to recognize that due to the relocation of shopping malls to large out-of-town, there is no traffic jam or traffic congestion in rush hours or at the weekend. Fourthly, when people drive outwards of the cities for shopping, they bring with them other demands including entertainment and food. Consequently, this tendency contributes to the development of under-privileged areas, partly narrowing the income gap between inhabitants living in suburbs and urban areas.
To sum up, as there are many advantages of increase in going to shopping in out-of-town stores, the government should adopt this form of planning widely around the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | OezenEC | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | OezenEC | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | anhminhdec | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | linh.king | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | minhanh2410 | 78 | view |
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 80
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ores is currently increasing, the issue as to whether people without cars have limited access...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s far as I am concerned, we cannot deny some of the benefits of this issue which will be an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, at least, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92579004031 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3094281775 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.6 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295423071186 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958409842001 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988372628014 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169348375676 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703838002226 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.