Some developing countries require to receive financial aid from international organisations to continue their development. Some people believe that practical aid or advice are more useful. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Some people argue that financial aid is the best approach for developing countries to alleviate poverty and become more economically developed. However, I belive that receiving practical aid and advice from international organisation could contribute more greatly to the sustainable development of a country in the long term.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that it is best to provide financial assistance for developing countries. First , external monetary flow might enable executive bodies of those countries to carry out a wide range of functions, for example infrastructural development and social healthcare and provide people who always struggle to make a living with basic necessities such as food or shelters. As a result, citizens in those nations will have a chance to enjoy a more decent standard of living, reducing considerably the rate of poverty. Second, foreign cash injections also play a vital role in building up an effective administration system by paying standard salaries for governmental staff members. With a stable income, most officials would be motivated to be fully in charge of social, technical, executive positions in courts of law, police stations and so forth. This will result in a decline in crime rate and foster economic progress
On the pther hand, I still side with those who argue that practical aid and advice from inetrnational organisations are a more effective solution to problems faced by developing countries. As a matter of fact, as direct monetary resources are limited and can only act as the short-term support to relieve some economic issues, sustainable development can not merely depend on support in the form of money from international organisations. That is the reason why it is more important to provide poor nations with professional and systematic education and training programs which send high-level experts to train local workforce and introduce advanced technologies. This would gradually create a more well-educated and productive workforce, postively affecting the national economic expasion
In conclusion, while direct financial support form international aid is an effective solution to tackle some problems, practical aid and advice is a more efficient measure in helping developing coutries to achieve economic progress in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-07 | lananh311a | 84 | view |
| 2017-04-05 | lananh311a | 84 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative impacts on social relationchips. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 76
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why do people buy imported foood? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 95
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Some others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more economically developed. However, I belive that receiving practical aid and ...
^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sistance for developing countries. First , external monetary flow might enable exe...
^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for example infrastructural development and social healthcare and provide people...
^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...o always struggle to make a living with basic necessities such as food or shelters. As a result, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...veloping countries. As a matter of fact, as direct monetary resources are limited...
^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t form international aid is an effective solution to tackle some problems, practi...
^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
... is a more efficient measure in helping developing coutries to achieve economic progress i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49584487535 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13766921493 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570637119114 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1670468055 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.363636364 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8181818182 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289741364487 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114625340787 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10324051887 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218115322555 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115116170114 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.