Secondary language are a part of curriculum in junior high schools ,so students are able to study lots of languages in high schools. some people hold onto notion that studying second languages in the elementary schools is better than junior high schools.
Various points could endose the reasons of Studying languages in primary schools. Because childre are able to receive knowlege as early as possible, elementary students have open minded for new information. Consequently, they can obtain new language much more easily than teenagers.
Seconly, primary shcools have flexible schedule for children to study languages and integrates with school actvities. Otherwise, adolescent has strictly timetable with many subjects that they need to fcus on. It is obviously that children in primary school are able to study new languages because they have motivation activities with flexible timetable that make them able to receive new languages than adolescent.
However, some people argue that languages structure are complex for primary students to study. That point is true but primary students can learn basic part of speech of those languages and studying more complexity structure in higher levels. Moreover, languages are not only studying of structure but also pronounciation and vocabularly. If primary students have fundamental skill of languages, they can easily understand more diffulty of languages.
In conclusion, primary students can study languages as early as possible because they wil have foundation skill of language to adapt with higher levels of language. Moreover, early studying of languages is effective for students because they are able to receive knowlege. So that initially studying language in primary school has more effective than high school.
- Some people think that parents should restrict their children from watching TV and playing computer games Instead time should be spent on reading books Do you agree disagree 44
- Some people think that all University students should study whether they like. Other believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such those related to science and technology. 61
- Some expert believe that it is better for children to begin learning a forienge language at primary school rather than secondary school. 56
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but poor alternative to a natural environment Is it necessary to keep animals in zoos 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweighs its disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...art of curriculum in junior high schools ,so students are able to study lots of la...
^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...tudy lots of languages in high schools. some people hold onto notion that studying s...
^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ause they are able to receive knowlege. So that initially studying language in primary ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63197026022 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73495310587 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468401486989 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.437437435 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274410258729 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116817355042 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826326062309 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173196275761 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474721178294 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.