Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary schools Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages

These days, there is a common belief that a foreign language should be inserted into the syllabus at elementary schools rather than secondary schools. While this has certain drawbacks, I am of the opinion that the merits will utterly overshadow those negative points.
As a matter of fact, there are a couple of compelling reasons why individuals hold the belief that letting children learn a foreign language at elementary schools is not beneficial. First and foremost, at the early age of 6-10, the majority of students will have a predilection for playing games, singing, or coloring, not for studying. Because they still do not have any awareness of the benefits of learning. Thus, learning a second language will be time-consuming and unnecessary for those children. Secondly, some children will find it challenging for them to study both the mother-tongue language and the second language, thus they will get confused between the two of them.
Turning to the other side of the argument, a foreign language should be added to the curriculum as soon as possible, especially in primary schools. First of all, some research has shown that because of the brain’s elasticity and rapid neural formation young children can learn languages at a faster and better rate. Thus, before being mature, learning a new language will be easy and effective. The second reason is that a second language gives kids an edge over their peers by increasing problem-solving, critical thinking, and listening skills, as well as improving their memory and concentration ability. As a result, children with knowledge of other languages experience greater cognitive flexibility and creativity.
To conclude, there are some aforementioned disadvantages caused by this trend. However, I believe that they are eclipsed by many tremendous merits. So, it will be a good way to add some foreign languages to the syllabus at elementary schools.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...singing, or coloring, not for studying. Because they still do not have any awareness of...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25407166124 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9552107166 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57328990228 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.640489842 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329641957518 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10103073001 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641003647865 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190892683511 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221440787625 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.