Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
What these days people are struggling with is that children should better start learning a new language at the first stages of schools or at the upper level. However, both of them have their merits and drawbacks, this essay will discuss this argument.
Whether most of mentors and parents contend that the primary schools are the best time of learning a foreign language is a controversial statement. Their idea has some benefits which they rely on them. They suggest that children are capable to mastered in a new language. Firstly, regarding the intellectual ability of kids, they show better react to learning. The critical period is indicated by less than 9-year-old age group. Secondly, from their point of view, this age group is much more enthusiastic than pupils who are studying at the secondary or high schools and the level of eagerness has a difference dramatically. Finally, based on academic evidence, they believe that children can be taught five foreign languages at the same time with a well worthy consequence.
Nevertheless, some critics have a different attitude in comparison with the mentioned experts. They indicate to some language barriers at the primary schools. They give some reasons as disadvantages of learning a foreign language in the childhood. Firstly, “the more efficient results in training, the more experience in studying”, they said. Secondly, they asked: how to tackle difficulties and address their linguistic blocks when children do not have any educational background in this field. They believe that learning a new subject needs cutting-edge equipment and materials and it is crucial and vital that students be the secondary or above level of studying to meet their linguistic needs.
In conclusion, both begin a new and foreign language at the primary and secondary schools have their advantages and downsides, but we cannot ignore the role of modern facilities in learning a new language.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Elmira Gh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | trucn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Salemo | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Asadbek2001 | 56 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- Nowadays many people work from home Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation in particular and of technologically advanced society in general 76
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the mentors') or simply say ''most mentors''.
Suggestion: most of the mentors; most mentors
...ay will discuss this argument. Whether most of mentors and parents contend that the primary sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'need'?
Suggestion: need
...hey believe that learning a new subject needs cutting-edge equipment and materials an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27009646302 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87322021115 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2367830877 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354980194664 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108610016532 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808766015366 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227285025803 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333153888417 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.