Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is undeniable that how a city is designed plays a critical role in its future development. A colorful city will become beneficial for tourism whereas functionality brings convenience to the citizens. I believe that a city being well-developed according to its functions will accommodate benefits for people rather than focusing on its outlook.
On the first hand, functionality provides flexibility to meet people’s expectations. It cannot be blamed that these facilities require an amount of money that comes from the government’s expenditure at first, however, it serves for the long-term aspect of the community and therefore it is worthwhile. For example, a city which serves the purpose of cargo should invest more money to improve its transport system while tourism, if it was the main purpose, then money should be spent to maintain the representative and the original form of tourist attractive places and places which have historical- related contents.
On the other hand, it has been observed that there is an increase in exorbitant expenditures on the city sideview. This phenomenon, however, is only being well- adapted for cities which have attractive tourist purposes, and these cities implement that their income will mainly come from this source. However, the priority conditions about places, environment, facilities, etc to become a travel city are normally not met by most of the city, and resulted in a false investment direction, creating a huge debt on the public. Nevertheless, it creates an imbalance in the cities’ economy, for example, making them become fragile when facing an economic crisis because no alternative income can be found, different to the functionality developed in other cities, where flexibilities provide many ways to deal with these circumstances.
In conclusion, I believe that although the beauty of a city is important, the government should consider carefully to accomplish its priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2022-04-28 | just_maianh | 77 | view |
| 2022-04-28 | just_maianh | 89 | view |
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 77
- Some people seek a lot of advice from family and friends when choosing their career Others feel it is better to choose a career more independently Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 56
- m 75
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44884488449 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11368954386 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5805632981 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.090909091 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190596841364 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718900341772 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286753825246 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113930548465 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139117886266 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44884488449 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11368954386 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5805632981 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.090909091 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190596841364 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718900341772 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286753825246 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113930548465 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139117886266 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.