Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry.
Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, many people who want to get into a museum or an art exhibition are required to pay the entrance fee, which is not the same for every museum in the world.
Although the act of charging visitors to these areas contains both positivity and negativity, I suppose that the drawbacks can overperform the benefits since it deters many people from broadening their horizons
On the one hand, admission charge is a great way to help museums or art galleries to improve their services and maintain their facilities as well as avoid being too crowded. In detail, these locations often have to spend most of their budget on a myriad of charges such as electricity, water or tax along with the annual fees for upgrading or remaining their amenities' qualities. Therefore, if they do not charge people, they will not have enough money to sustain their operations. Moreover, people often show strong preferences towards free goods or services that they even may not need. As a result, since museums are free to enter they are flocked by mass tourisms and local residents, which can cause devastating consequences
On the other hand, letting people come to museums or art exhibitions without any charges can bring a much greater deal of shortcomings involving in inequality and conflicts between different classes in society. These places are established prominently for education and give more opportunities for people to acquire deeper insights into a greater scale of knowledge. Also, requiring payment for admission also deter low-class people and arouse their frustration as they do not afford to go into these areas. Therefore, this activity expands the distance between rich and poor people as well as fails to educate people as their initial purpose. For example, although everyone knows that museums can enhance their insights into the world, they may feel hesitate to come when they have to pay money to get into these places since it is obviously not as necessary as spending money on food or accommodation
To conclude, although selling tickets can help many museums and art galleries to improve their services as well as facilities, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages since it raise the inequality between people in different classes and takes away the chances of learning new things of many people
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | mary.ssherr | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | damn999 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | Sukh-73 | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 90
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 84
- a new generation of entrepreneurs believe that privately funded space tourism will be the next exciting development in space exploration How true do you think this is How would space tourism affect space exploration as we know it today 95
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 61
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07552083333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67629157998 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533854166667 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.250337955 49.4020404114 292% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.9 106.682146367 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4 20.7667163134 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224959333631 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892480738962 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450433128786 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120333833929 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525136734574 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.78957915832 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 10.7795591182 260% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07552083333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67629157998 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533854166667 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.250337955 49.4020404114 292% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.9 106.682146367 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.4 20.7667163134 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224959333631 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892480738962 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450433128786 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120333833929 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525136734574 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.78957915832 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 10.7795591182 260% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.