Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
More and more companies these days are approaching to the trend of casual dress code to focus more on the productivity rather than the rules. While I agree that dressing should not be seen in relation to work output, I still stand on that smart work-wear is essential for some professions.
On the one hand, casual work-wear is aimed to make employees more relaxed and to make a friendly working environment. Thereby, creativity and productivity could be enhanced. Google and Facebook, the world's leading companies in technology sector, are great examples for this trend. Google has been well-known for its laid-back corporate culture in which its employees are allowed to wear what they find comfortable with such as jeans, t-shirt, sport shoes, etc. And Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook CEO, famously works in a hoodie.
On the other hand, formal dress code obviously contributes to build trustworthiness, professionalism, confidence for some occupations as lawyers, bankers, teachers and so on. For instance, customers who do business with someone well-dressed would certainly feel more respected from their partners and gain a trust that their business would be going well. In addition, smart attire at workplaces like uniforms also serves practical purposes like distinction between customers and restaurant staff, between patients and doctors and nurses, or between passengers and flight crew; uniforms serves safety purposes as well, for example, construction workers.
In conclusion, I support the trend toward relaxed dress code at workplaces since it can make workers feel at ease in which their creativity could be encouraged but I do not see it as appropriate to all occupations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-25 | Anh Tran134 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? (IELTS Academic Test, 2017) 78
- The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. Write at least 150 words. 41
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular. Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96802480752 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.924825708 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12283033588 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468884931605 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409545292491 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744598629032 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327930610144 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.