Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Outward appearance is not only important in personal life but also necessary in working life. Hence, a vigorous debate has been triggered over whether formal attire at the workplace has great significance than the quality of work. In my opinion, I believe that quality of work is more likely to have a high value above appearance.
First, by requiring that employees dress smartly, it will give a professional impression, for it reflects the culture of the workplace. In other words, it means that the company takes their work seriously. Therefore, it provides confidence which associates with working efficiency. Moreover, dress smartly can raise morale among staff because it imposes discipline effectively, so dress smartly prevails friendly and positive attitude. As a result, formal attire contributes to having excellent manner and work success. However, quality of work cannot be overlooked.
One of the main factor to boost productivity is the quality of work because it helps to achieve objectives of an organization. For example, in modern companies, such as Facebook, they give priorities to the quality of work rather than outward appearance. Mark Zuckerberg- the chief executive officer of Facebook- attends meeting dressing casual wear because he said that “he didn’t have time to choose clothes”, so he saves time for work in order to increase the output. Consequently, to meet the company aims, quality of work should be highly considered over formal attire.
In conclusion, I believe that the appearance of employees has less value than quality of work. This is due to the quality of work play an important in growing profitability of organizations.
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jamhow true do you think this statement is?what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 68
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for your kitchen but it did not work. You phoned the shop but no action was taken. Write a letter to the shop manager. In your letter describe- the problem with the equipment- explain what happened when you phoned 81
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation and cost. 78
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of traveling to a work place every day.Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39245283019 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99755210442 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2989361568 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282333974354 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988253457176 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703608453588 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17485447446 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248554042886 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.