Some parents believe children’s leisure activities should be always educational, but others think it will cause more pressure on children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Leisure activities play an important role in a child’s daily routine. It helps them reduce stress after a long time studying at schools. However, some parents think that these activities must also be educational to boost their kid's intellect. Both views will be discussed before my conclusion.
On the one hand, to find a good job in this highly competitive markets, a careful and detailed preparation is essential. Thus, it quite common that parents nowadays often let their kids participate in difference academic clubs in the out-of-school time. For example, getting acquaintance with science from an early age let their kids have a great opportunity to reach the newest technology which may help them find out their own passion to develop a STEM career in the future. In addition, the soft-skills which are brought by being a member of a social club also help children improve both communication and presentation skills.
On the other hand, maintaining a mental and physical health is also as important as the intellect one. Hence, people regardless age should engage in outdoor activities. Playing sports is such an activity which are the most suitable for children, especially for those who want to improve their body strength. For instance, engaging in swimming or basketball helps one’s height increase significantly, while running and dancing benefits for increasing metabolism and maintaining weight. In addition, playing sports also helps one reduce stress and enhance sleep quality, thus grows children creativity and productivity.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that education plays an important role in boosting one career in the future. However, enhancing and maintaining a healthy body cannot be ignored, thus I personally believe that children should also engage in non-educational leisure activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46478873239 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00226390807 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62323943662 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8371998369 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.466666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189112271699 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654146024446 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645329638446 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12383240947 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064632293821 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.