Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequence could this style of parenting have children as they get older?
Smart parenting plays a paramount role to raise respectful and well- behaved children. Presently, some masses ponder that some parents are overly permissive and open- minded towards their children. Here, I would like to throw lights on its consequences and impacts on juveniles.
There are manifold points to ensure its darker sides. First and foremost, the children of indulgent parents are likely to grow up with several negative personality traits. To illustrate, such parenting style not only leads to children self centered but also irresponsible towards their duties. Thus, over-dependence causes a great risk in overall development of any child. Additionally, it is norm that over- indulgent parents are more lenient and do not give any punishment. Therefore children miss the opportunity to learn from their mistakes and become materialistic.
Furthermore, excess of caring mould their offspring’s into stubborn ones. To elaborate, parents who succumbing too much to their children demands raise them willful as well as undisciplined. Hence, high demanding child are always getting on nerves of parents.
Numerous points can be mentioned to the risks associated with such parenting. To begin, inappropriate parenting style causing greedy personalities on child’s mindset and this can jeopardize the society in future. As a result, criminal activities may rise in case of lack of financial budget. Finally, children of permissive parents mostly have harsh behavior and lack of patience and this have adverse effects on their future relationships.
To recapitulate, parents should help their children to develop self-control and respect for others, I do not believe that lenient parenting support this objective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 83 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-24 | ojehparvaz | 56 | view |
- Some people support the development of factory farming and the science creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture, but others oppose to these development. Discuss both views. 56
- Nowadays people buy a lot of things even though they don t really need them Why it is happening Is it a positive or negative trend 59
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots why do you think it is happening Is it negative or positive development 84
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should be do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Does u agree or disagree? 54
- Major companies use sports events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative effect on sports To what extent do u agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lenient and do not give any punishment. Therefore children miss the opportunity to learn ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...set and this can jeopardize the society in future. As a result, criminal activities may r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent parenting support this objective.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71153846154 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08488153465 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661538461538 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4321106098 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370672385663 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106418486645 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915027705946 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212591384105 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395929181721 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.