Major companies use sports events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sports. To what extent do u agree or disagree
Sports play a magnificent role to uplift the standard of health, wealth and relationship. Presently, it is quite common to see sporting events, teams and even individual players wearing logos on uniforms to advertise the company products. Whereas some masses claim that it has darker sides. Here, I would like to accord with given statement.
To begin with, commercialization has changed the attitude of the players and jeopardized the true spirit of the game. To illustrate, company offers lavishly to players that not only make players acquisitive but also lured them into vicious web of match fixing. Hence, bidding on sport events has hampered and defamed the spirit of the game. Furthermore, consumers probably get tempt by inferior products in stake to meet their favorite celebrity.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, TV viewers get to see lot of advertisements during breaks in between their favourite TV programs. Therefore, this deviates their concentration thereby reducing entertainment value of the programs they are matching is a drawback. Finally, some companies use obscene materials in their advertisements to attract views which, pollute viewers mind especially that of younger ones.
On the contrary, critics assert that advertising helps in increasing awareness about a company product as services. To elaborate, people get to know about company new offerings easily which is worthwhile to fulfill their dire needs. Thus, advertising plays paramount role to acquainted people with appropriate knowledge and information. What is more, promotion through well recognized brand ambassador helps in elevating sales and profits of accompany which is beneficial to boost the economy of a country.
To recapitulate, I believe that sponsorship is required for a sport to rise and reach out to common people but too much allurement and advertisement have overshadowed the true meaning of ample number of sports which must be limited.
- Nowadays people buy a lot of things even though they don t really need them Why it is happening Is it a positive or negative trend 59
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in education of their children. Discuss both views. 67
- Some people support the development of factory farming and the science creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture, but others oppose to these development. Discuss both views. 56
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should be do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Does u agree or disagree? 54
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly work free or can t be bought Do u agree 81
Comments
You can find here more about…
You can find here more about this site and learn more about the various services. This will help you understand who you can entrust your papers to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orms to advertise the company products. Whereas some masses claim that it has darker si...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ke to meet their favorite celebrity. Further emphasizing on my point of view, TV vie...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ising plays paramount role to acquainted people with appropriate knowledge and in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, on the contrary, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48514851485 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02578534001 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656765676568 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4388938625 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185202875147 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515220765672 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348125376432 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895689401315 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177781408326 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.