Everything has two sides and the educational method is not an exception. In the past, the strict method for education seemed like the most traditional way of education, but nowadays many people criticize it. In my point of view the other method of education of friendly approach is a fruitable way for best generation of students.
It must acknowledge that many people whom specialists in the educational process or students parents believe with teachers should be strict with their students for many reasons. Strict technique make students more independent care about their subjects. In addition to force student to do their homework in prospective time without any shortage. Also, the strict method support the say of learning in childhood like a scripting on the stones, where this say will be more accurate if teachers force their student to study hard.
Nevertheless, other people agree with the friendly approach of the method of dialing between teachers and their student. However, students need some of strict, they will be more pro-active with the friendly dial with teachers. Students with this method will love the subjects and do the homework easier. Some subjects like Math requires students to be full concentrate without afraid feeling from their student to reach the level of understanding. Also, this method will avoid any psychological problems maybe occurs to students. Many studies have been issued for this debate and revealed that friendly dial achieve better result. In addition to Parents and student's teacher Encouragements push them to be more creative. Eventually, this method encourage the student to go their schools without absents.
Overall, people should feel free to agree or disagree about this controversial issue, but no one criticize with our students needs more efforts from us. So, I totally support friendly approach of dial between teachers and their students.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison whre relevant. 75
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 73
- The graph below descibes the statstics rainfall for somecountry 56
- The report of world population growth (rewrite)) 73
- The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32781456954 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69653756781 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516556291391 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4516109175 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6470588235 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342681389549 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122039110381 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975723093073 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213787025057 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078277833721 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.