Some people argue that arts, such as paintings and music, are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the process of dividing annual government budget in a city, this question usually comes to mind that which section has the main importance? The cultural attractions or the infrastructure of a city. In the following paragraphs, the significance of both sections will be critically discussed before coming to a conclusion.
Firstly, boosting cultural attractions leads to the improvement of tourism, both domestic and international, and the unity of society. Museums and art galleries, for instance, act as a real social network, and provide an atmosphere which in people with same interests can gather and interact. As a result of interactions among people, the prejudices and barriers that exist among them will be broken, and their mutual understanding of various cultures and lifestyles will be improved.
By contrast, critics point that the infrastructure is of more importance for the development of a country, particularly for economic growth and alleviation of poverty. Public transportation, health care system, or energy generation are examples of areas that should be planned for development to promote the economy of a nation. Therefore, it is obvious that the financial priority should be given to the fundamental facilities of a city since they are the basic needs of further developments.
In conclusion, although building cultural structures such as theaters and museums have always been considered as places that have this power for unifying population, but it will be a waste of time and money where the infrastructure of a city is still inadequate and incomplete. Hence, I personally believe that enough funds must be allocated to the extension of basic requirements of a city before the extension of cultural aspects.
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to better life Discuss both these views and give your opinion 63
- Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education but other people claim that it is the individual’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42490842491 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24055150239 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1829710013 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.636363636 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822650303162 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269442846478 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357328025711 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470866123938 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213043281094 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.