There are many arguments between whether students be allowed to use their phones at school or not. I personally see both benefits and drawbacks for both opinions.
In terms of being banned by the family or school regulations, this usually happens for students in small grades, especially for those who have just learned Elementary schools with the ages of 6 to 10. They are almost forbidden because the adults believe that children cannot be able to focus on their lessons if they use phones at class. They are also easy to be distracted by interesting things than their lecture and simply cannot control themselves to procrastinate from their schooling.
On the flip side, things have changed since students are more mature. School and family could not stop them from using mobile phones when they come to study at Secondary and High School. There are several reasons for this. Firstly, there are many complicated and overload amounts of homework required to use word processing to solve. Taking my circumstance as an example, I had some reports when I was in the Secondary school and my teacher asked me to use my phone to search for information. It is clear that I was supported by my teacher so that the lecture became effective. My parents also encouraged me to bring my phone along for contacting with them in order to pick me up timely at that time. From this, we may recognise that having no technological equipment for adolescence is somehow really inconvenient.
To conclude, I do trust eliminating the usage of phones during the school day should depend on the age of children and their self-awareness.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Although the prices of fuels have greatly increased over the last decade or two it is argued that further increases in fuel prices are the only way to reduce world consumption of fuel and lesson pressure on worlds fuel resources To what extent do you agre 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72327950084 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4409464276 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317062170181 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101273745137 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774424919608 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210517671276 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474023193371 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.