Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will
have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are
worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more
intelligent than humans. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
People seem to be either excited or worried about the future impact of artificial
intelligence. Personally I can understand the two opposing points of view; I am
both fascinated by developments in artificial intelligence and apprehensive about
its possible negative effects.
On the one hand, the increasing intelligence of technology should bring some
obvious benefits. Machines are clearly able to do many jobs better than humans
can, especially in areas that require high levels of accuracy or calculations using
large amounts of data. For example, robots are being developed that can carry out
surgical procedures with greater precision than a human doctor, and we already
have cars that use sensors and cameras to drive themselves. Such technologies can
improve safety by reducing the likelihood of human errors. It is easy to imagine
how these developments, and many others, will steadily improve our quality of
life.
On the other hand, I share the concerns of people who believe that artificial
intelligence may harm us if we are not careful. In the short term, it is likely that we
will see a rise in unemployment as workers in various industries are replaced by
machines or software programs. For example, self-driving vehicles are expected to
cause redundancies in driving jobs, such as lorry drivers, taxi drivers and bus drivers. In the medium term, if intelligent technologies gradually take jobs away
from humans, we may find that people become deskilled and lose their sense of
purpose in life. A longer term fear is that computers become so intelligent that they
begin to make decisions without human oversight and without regard for our well-
being.
In conclusion, while intelligent machines will no doubt improve our lives in many
ways, the potential risks of such technologies should not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dorae | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Adamfaker | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | MrDiyorbek | 84 | view |
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 78
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 100
- around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Begin
...ters become so intelligent that they begin to make decisions without human oversig...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3537414966 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90090393644 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636054421769 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3000662118 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275203639899 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869130291635 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569693252178 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662329228362 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577280846976 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.