Tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
The chart illustrates the visitors to England who came to four distint sites between 1980 and 2010.
In general, the proportion of tourists who visited the Pier and the Pavilion increased over the 30-year period, while the proportion visiting the Art Gallery and the Festival decreased.
In 1980, the number of visitors coming to the Pavilion was over 25%. The trend continued until it reached a peak of almost 50% by 1995 and started falling from there to 2010, when it had approximately 30%. The growth was also recorded at the Pier, which attracted about 10% of all tourists in 1980. This site underwent fluctuation until it peaked at approximately 20% by 2010.
The Art Gallery and the Festival both saw a reduction in the number of visitors during the period depicted. In 1980, almost 20% of all tourists came to the Art Gallery. The growth on this site hit its highest of nearly 38% in 1985, and then it began to drop until 2010, when it was at under 10%. Approximately 30% of all tourists came to the Festival in 1980, and the trend still remained until it declined to nearly 28% by 2010, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-27 | taoxanh99 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | lalo | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
- around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Percentage of female MPs 73
- Oil Production Capacity 78
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of tourists who visited the Pier and the Pavilion increased over the 30-year peri...
^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilion increased over the 30-year period, while the proportion visiting the Art Ga...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67857142857 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55621410076 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4658511181 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148628662826 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585271498349 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704962503525 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11352656901 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668293074271 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.