In the development of company regulation, the preference of employers to extending their job activity in the age of 60 emerges to the public. Some people believe that transferring knowledge to the new generation is better than hiring people who have time for their retirement. I support this argument and I am going to explain the reason.
To begin with, work productivity will deteriorate as the same as the improvement of employer age above 60 years old. This information has been supported by many studies in which old people don’t have strong body compared to the younger who have age between 25 and 60. For instance, the company which is specialized in construction will need younger people to work in the field because many activities are done by physic. Equally important, when the job activities are conducted in the office, the oldest tend to use conventional thinking than the younger. For instance, the younger generation will utilize their technology to solve their job not only to be more efficient but also to be on time.
On the other hand, the company needs transformation not only to challenge the younger but also to manage the number of human resource in the company. If there is no transferring knowledge, the company will not continue its business. For example, people with a high level of experience and professional should share their knowledge with the younger because the younger will substitute their position when they haven’t been hired again. But, if the number of younger is not ready, the business process will shut down.
In conclusion, people skill are interchangeable so that retirement at the age of 60 will give a chance for the younger to pursue the business process for the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...use many activities are done by physic. Equally important, when the job activities are ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0276816609 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86481786985 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7123965305 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190633997128 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698300576328 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722667775957 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14045795067 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645806466758 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.