Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree ?

In modern era, scientists play a paramount role in individuals life. Handful of people seems that the entertainers are more important in comparison to scientists. However, I completely disagree with this notion because, scientists do lot of innovations which become in the form of aids in the everyone life.
To embrace with, the scientists innovate numerous gadgets which individuals use in their daily basis such as mobile phones, televisions and many other items. It promotes to make life easy. For instance, in last decade, the whole world was suffered from pandemic situations in which government enforced the lockdown due to which, individuals became fed up in their homes.
In this criteria, individuals utilise their mobile phones for their all tasks which become helpful to them in COVID-19 situation. Therefore, scientific innovation become prominent to homo sapiens.
Furthermore, scientists also prepare medicines which becomes helpful to masses to those who are suffered from diseases. Whereas, it is crucial point because entertainers are good for nothing in comparison to scientists. For instance, in 2020, the world stucked in pandemic situation and the cases of this issue was on alarmed rate. Therefore, scientists prepare covid vaccine which aids the individuals who faced such problems. Moreover, scientists also forcast about regular weather which becomes too helpful to individuals.
To conclude, scientists are paramount instead of entertainers because this becomes more prominent in the daily basis of individuals and make their lifestyle much comfortable.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-22 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-22 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2023-12-26 ililmaidatuz 73 view
2023-12-26 ililmaidatuz 73 view
2023-12-21 Dangdang 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'everyone'?
Suggestion: the; everyone
...ons which become in the form of aids in the everyone life. To embrace with, the scientists...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...uals became fed up in their homes. In this criteria, individuals utilise their mob...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63179916318 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91256068627 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573221757322 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2407689115 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134196717157 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543439409209 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686516811571 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896281782383 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087220605614 0.056905535591 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.