Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that it is essential for the authority to prioritize expenditure on public services such as health systems, education instead of the arts like painting and music. I strongly disagree with this point of view, as I believe that artist support is worthwhile in terms of both cultural and economic benefits.
First of all, the arts reflect the culture of a social section in a country, which is almost neglected these days. This is because newer forms of entertainment like online games have emerged. Therefore, preserving the art and passing it to the next generation is of great importance and the responsibility of the government. While it is true that individual members of the public are partly responsible for preserving a country’s literary and artistic heritage, these sources of financial support alone are insufficient.
Furthermore, the art industry is huge and can be a great source of income for a city or a country. A key reason for this is that the leisure industry has experienced a dramatic boom in recent years. Therefore, the public demand for the entertainment of all kinds continues to grow. For instance, thousands of tourists flock to experience the works of art in the Louvre in Paris, to see a Shakespeare play in England, or to listen to live music played by their favorite performers and genres of music.
In conclusion, although important sectors such as health and education should be the top government priority, I disagree that the arts should be a waste of public money.
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicles and CO2 emissions in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020 73
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 61
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00392156863 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95079733652 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1173494181 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187118008987 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642750688425 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822111368524 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13357764302 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991900320879 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.