Some people believe that the government should provide financial assistance to all artists including painters, musicians and poets. Others think that it is a waste of money. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.
It is true that opinions have diverged on whether or not artists such as painters, musicians or poets should receive financial support from the government. While there are some valid arguments against the idea that the state subsidy is lavished on arts, I still believe that the government should invest in other fields.
Opponents usually argue that the financial resources for artists are of great importance for the development of arts around the world. Firstly, it is recognized that arts are an effective way to boost the enrichment of people’s emotional life. Painters harmonize the beauty of colors, musicians create enchanting notes and poets use words to sympathize with the disadvantages of people, leading to the fact that virtually all artists have made immense contributions to diversify people’s feelings about their surroundings. Moreover, there is evidence to support the idea that masterpieces and compositions created by these artists possibly improve the country’s economic growth since they can help to increase the number of visitors to the sites. A case in point is the famous portrait of Mona Lisa that can attract numerous people paying a visit to France to watch, resulting in the enormous profit that the French government can gain annually.
Despite the preceding arguments, I support the view that the government support on arts is a waste of money. With the continuous development of technological and industrial industries, the government should invest in their related fields so that they can keep up with other developed countries. A case in point is that the government support on the introduction of new technology on agriculture can help farmers boost their harvests instead of wasting money on arts, which certainly has little meaning to people’s daily life. In underdeveloped and developing countries, there are various aspects should be given priority such as medical services or education. By ensuring that its citizens are healthy and well-educated, the government can relieve the pressure on national expenses and increase economic growth.
In conclusion, even though investments in arts can be lucrative, I strongly believe that the government should allocate financial assistance on other fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | thecarromato | 87 | view |
| 2014-09-21 | bocahnakal | 35 | view |
- Some people believe that the government should provide financial assistance to all artists including painters musicians and poets Others think that it is a waste of money Discuss both points of view and give your opinion 87
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 73
- Many people think that advertisements aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 61
- In many countries nowadays, people still live with their parents after marriage. Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages? 84
- The diagram below shows how the coffee is produced and prepared for sales in supermarkets and shops. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... is true that opinions have diverged on whether or not artists such as painters, musicians or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50857142857 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02115128751 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4796593197 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.307692308 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253111945065 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849767418817 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540061079917 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164917568627 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450701690478 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.