The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012.
The diagrams depict the transformation of a school campus between 1985 and 2012. In general, it can be seen that the landscape in 2012 had more infrastructures than in 1985 as the number of students accelerated from 1500 people to 2300 people within 27 years.
In 1985, the school campus had few structures. The landscape had an enormous playing field with a street linked to a car park. There was an office next to the car park and a library to the south of the office. Another smaller car park was located next to the library, opposite a two-story classroom block.
By 2012, considerable changes had occurred in the school campus as the number of buildings and structures had increased. For example, during that period, the smaller car park was demolished to plant trees and the bigger car park was modernized to be shaped like a semicircle. The library was converted into a computer room to store resources while the classroom block was modernized to be a three-story one. Another notable development was the contraction of the playing field to make room for two classroom buildings, a swimming pool, and a fitness club.
- Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species. Some people think that it is too late to do anything. Some people think that we should take effective action to improve the situation. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- In many countries nowadays, people still live with their parents after marriage. Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages? 84
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 73
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generations companies should encourage high-level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree/disagree? Why? 80
- Should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government, or should it be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86010362694 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82226985238 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2703450456 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204042242805 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100065767952 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114471627247 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150416030966 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709842986774 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.