Some people believe that government should spend money on building trains and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce the situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Traffic congestion is an aching problem of many administrations in over the world. It is believed that government should investment to build for trains and metros system to mitigate traffic jam. However, others think that building more and larger a lot of roads is the better way. In my opinion, I agree that building and erecting road is more effective solution to handle in situation.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why government should build train and metro systems. One reason is that if trains and metros system is up to standard, the number of private vehicles which participate in the roads will reduce, which result, the traffic jam will decline. For example, in Singapore, subway systems are the most developed in the world, therefore, there are the lowest rate in the traffic jams. Furthermore, if people go to work or go to school by public vehicles, the accidents on the road will declined. This may lead to reduce traffic congestion.
On the other hand, I believe that government should build and extend a lot of roads is the better way. Firstly, in developing countries, since roads are narrow and in a desperate state of disrepair, travelers obstructed to the destination, which results, the rate of traffic congestion would increase significantly. By building and maintaining the roads, a lot of vehicle will be easy go on the road, which allows decrease traffic congestion. Secondly, doing new roads, local people have more road to go to work or study, which allows reduce people in traffic on the roads. This means that, people have more choose to move, therefore, the traffic congestions are reduced. For instance, to go city center, people in suburbs can go over one of five bridge such as: Chuong Duong bridge, Vinh Tuy bridge, Nhat Tan bridge, Thanh Tri bridge, Long Bien bridge, as a result, the traffic jam is reduced.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments government should build for trains and metros system to reduce traffic jam, but I believe that building and extending a lot of roads is the more effective solution in situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | Dao Thu Ha | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-09 | nthelittle | 70 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 67
- Some people believe that government should spend money on building trains and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce the situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun vehicle seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of vehicles'.
Suggestion: a lot of vehicles
... By building and maintaining the roads, a lot of vehicle will be easy go on the road, which allo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93767705382 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67753491788 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473087818697 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7524154026 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3125 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361378109741 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142844519694 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101513182234 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269567018455 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743973267704 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.