In this modern world, when people can easily study in universities, the problem about school fees is still being discussed. People believe that governments should pay that fees for the students who want to study in universities. But in my point of view, I totally disagree with this kind of notion. I think that they should pay for that by themselves.
Now, there are more and more people can go to universities and the cost is absolutely really high. So how can the governments pay for all of that. That is impossible. Moreover, in the situation that the governments have enough ability to pay for the full course fees, where the money comes from? It is the money tax which citizens have to hand in. Instead of doing that, those amount of money can be used in many other useful things. For instance, we can use money to help the homeless, the impoverished, patients who do not have enough money to pay for the hospital expenses, and so many others. Besides, the people who study in universities these days are mostly from wealthy class. They have stable incomes and paying for the school expenses is no matter with them. If the governments still decide to pay for all of that, a great many of people outsides will lose a good-salary jobs. Finally, in the society that people esteem the qualifications with no ends, so who can go to universities can be appreciated by everyone and can easily get a good job.
In conclusion, because due to universities, they can get all the good things. Therefore, I think they, the students not the governments, should pay for their fees by themselves.
- In many countries people increasingly talk about money how much they earn or how much they pay for things in their daily conversations Why Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- In many countries people increasingly talk about money how much they earn or how much they pay for things in their daily conversations Why Is this a positive or negative trend 81
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68214285714 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6944174146 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507142857143 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4853362629 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1176470588 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36671013647 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123464115887 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118076660209 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260293861154 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123177109373 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.58950901804 79% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.